Year after year, the workload for in-house legal teams increases even as budgets are slashed. In 2024, 69% of general counsel faced moderate to significant cost pressure, and 59% of chief legal officers (CLOs) said their workload had increased in the past year.
So, itâs valid for GCs, CLOs, and other corporate legal leaders to be unhappy about budget constraints. It can feel like the only answer is a bigger budget, even when you know thatâs an uphill battle.
But as a smart general counsel, you realize itâs prudent to focus on the variables you can control. For example, could operational inefficiencies within the legal department â particularly around legal matter management â be contributing to frustrations? How can you identify a better way forward when youâve always done things the same way?
Here are some key warning signs that indicate your teamâs processes need a tune-up.
â
â
If youâre a manager or executive-level leader for your legal department, put yourself in the shoes of your lawyers. Itâs 8 a.m. on a work day, and your inbox is already overflowing with âurgentâ requests. The sales team wants a contract reviewed yesterday. HR needs a compliance question answered by lunch. Procurement sent you a 100-page RFP to sift through by the end of the week. And you have four unread Slacks youâre avoiding because you canât stomach more being asked of you.
For many in-house counsel, this is the norm. But, it shouldnât be. There are significant costs to a business for this type of inefficiency, both real and emotional. Instead of constantly digging through emails, spreadsheets, messaging apps, Salesforce, ticketing systems, and sticky notes to figure out what they need to do, lawyers should be able to sit down each day, open one system, and quickly know what their priorities are, freeing up their time to focus on high-impact legal work.
â
The metrics that matter most can vary by organization, but common legal KPIs include volume of work, average turnaround time for requests, average time at each approval stage, and number of contracts reviewed or matters completed per month. Without this insight, itâs nearly impossible to make decisions about your teamâs current and future capacity.
You probably already know these numbers could be beneficial, but if you arenât measuring the figures for your team, youâre not alone. Only 46% of legal departments globally are using KPIs to measure the departmentâs operating model. For many teams, identifying these KPIs is difficult because they donât have the data. The best and easiest way to start measuring operating metrics accurately is with dedicated in-house legal matter management software. Processes can feel scattered and chaotic without these tools.
â
Inefficiency can impact your team on a deeply personal level. When attorneys are working too hard, theyâre often the first in and the last out each day. Even if theyâre hard workers, you might find a general lack of motivation and morale across the team. As the problem gets worse, the turnover rate increases, leading to repetitive investment in training new hires.
It can be easy to assume that decreasing productivity is the fault of individual employees, but if you notice a problem with multiple team members, operational inefficiency may be to blame. When in-house counsel have to work overtime just to get the bare minimum done, they donât have the energy to support strategic projects.
In other words, your teamâs inefficient processes may be driving good talent away.
â
If youâre using any dedicated legal technology, thatâs a step in the right direction. But systems that donât talk to each other can create more admin work than theyâre worth.
For example, if your contract lifecycle management (CLM) software doesnât integrate with the generic project management or ticketing system you use for tracking legal requests (e.g., Jira, Monday.com, Asana), contract requests must be duplicated in each system. And without one single source of truth, stakeholders involved in the approval process can get confused about which tool to use, leading to miscommunication or complete disregard for the processes youâve tried to set in place.
With disconnected systems, collaboration is harder, projects move slower, and KPIs are more difficult to measure.
â
Stop us if any of these complaints sound familiar:
We bet youâve heard one (or all) of these before. Sure, the problem could be a lack of internal PR, which could be remedied with better communication about the work your team is doing. But it could also be that inefficiencies are slowing lawyers down and preventing them from contributing real value to the business.
Improved efficiency and better prioritization help in-house lawyers focus on revenue-generating projects, providing better business value and improving internal stakeholder satisfaction. And, as a bonus, that positive perception opens up the possibility of the finance team granting a bigger budget. Itâs a win-win.
â
Put the usual chaos aside for a moment and imagine a legal department thatâs proactive, collaborative, and fully aligned with the organizationâs goals. Itâs possible â but first, you need to address the inefficiencies holding you back.
If your team isnât using matter management software to centralize and automate intake, triage, contract review, and more, itâs time to look for a solution. Streamline AI is the modern front door for legal, helping you gain complete visibility into all your teamâs work and free up resources for strategic initiatives.
â
Learn more about Streamline AIâs matter management software.
Scale your legal team's efficiency and effectiveness with modern workflow automation tools designed for in-house legal.